Helen Shaw - SFHA Finance Conference - 12 November 2024
Introductions
Good afternoon everyone, it’s great to be invited back again to talk to you today.
So, the brief I was given was to talk about the economic landscape for RSLs, the SHR’s current work and priorities, and what we could see in the year ahead.
A lot to cover so bear with me!
On the economic landscape, other commentators have very succinctly set out the current context. For us as Regulator, the key factors which we see as a result of the post-pandemic world, the cost of living crisis the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East and recent global political changes all come together to create an uncertain, unpredictable, and volatile context.
On the plus side, last week we saw the Bank of England cut interest rates to 4.75%, the second cut in the base rate this year. And the Bank of England has indicated that interest rates are likely to continue to fall gradually from this point, provided inflation stays close to the Bank’s 2% target.
The Bank’s latest monetary policy report also highlights that wages in 2024 will increase on average by 5.5% compared to 6% last year.
However, the UK government’s recent budget also included changes to the National Insurance payments.
We have done some initial calculations and with the usual caveats about the nature of the calculations, we estimate that the aggregate impact on RSLs will be around £15m in additional costs each year.
The calculation includes the impact of the 1.2% increase in employers’ NIC and the reduction in the secondary threshold, the level at which employers start paying national insurance on each employee’s salary, from £9,100 a year to £5,000. And this doesn’t include the impact that the minimum wage rise will have on landlords.
And we also know now the outcome from the US elections and the main immediate issue for the UK would appear to be the potential impact on the UK economy if there are tariffs imposed on imports. This could have a significant impact if these happen and could see inflation rise and interest rates stay put or even rise again.
Inflation fell below the Bank of England’s target in the year to September, but it is (and probably always was) expected to rise again as energy bills increase over the colder winter months. Inflation was then forecast to drop back to 2% by 2026 but it remains to be seen what the impact of the political change in the US will mean for prices in the UK.
Earlier this year, the Scottish Parliament’s declared a national housing emergency. The declaration is clearly significant, although it is largely symbolic, and sits alongside the declaration of local emergencies in 12 local authority areas. Such declarations don’t trigger any defined actions or release additional resources.
The Scottish Government is working with its stakeholders to agree an action plan in response to the declaration. But in our work, we are seeing acute issues in housing which reflect some of the reasons which have led to the declaration of the housing emergency.
We are seeing in particular the number of homelessness applications continuing to rise and, perhaps most significantly, a marked increased in failures by local authorities to meet their statutory duties in relation to homelessness.
Essentially in many areas of Scotland the demands in the homelessness system – the number of people who are homeless, and the level of need they have – exceed the capacity in the system to respond. For some councils, the increase in capacity that is needed goes beyond that which they can deliver alone. And that is what we mean when we describe some councils as being impacted by systemic failure.
As things stand, there is a real risk of statutory failures becoming endemic in some council areas.
Systemic failure requires a systemic intervention. Over the longer term this is about reducing the demands on the system by preventing homelessness. But for now, the immediate focus has to be about increasing the capacity in the system to meet the current level of demand and need.
In the context of constrained public finances, it doesn’t feel like there are easy or quick actions that will end the current situation speedily. While there may be some consequentials for Scotland from the recent UK Budget, it looks likely that the next year will be at least as tough as the last one.
The response to the housing emergency therefore might be as much about actions to mitigate the worst impacts of the current situation, while we all consider what changes might be needed over the longer term to change the underlying structural weaknesses in our housing system.
As a regulator, we have an important role to play in informing the discussion on the policy response required to tackle the housing emergency. So, within that context, I thought it would be helpful to say a little about the current financial situation in the sector in aggregate.
I’d also like to touch on some of the issues that are affecting individual RSLs where we’re engaging around finance as I know that is also of interest to many of you.
So, the financial position of the sector. Our most recent financial returns received from RSLs look back at the past through the annual financial statements and loan portfolios to the year ended 31 March 2024. But they also consider RSL financial forecasts for the next five years.
And what all of these tell us is that despite a tightening of sector finances and less margin for error, overall liquidity in the sector remains robust and RSLs in general have maintained sufficient liquidity.
Firstly, I wanted to take a quick look back at some of the key highlights from the most recent set of loan portfolio returns and annual financial returns.
To reflect briefly on where we are now.
And then, and perhaps most importantly, to talk about where we might be headed.
We published our most recent loan portfolio report last month, and this highlighted that, overall, during 2023/24 there was a reduction in both the number of RSLs arranging new borrowing and the level of new finance being put in place compared with the previous 5 years.
At the end of March 24, RSLs had £6.8bn in debt facilities available, with just over £6bn of that debt drawn.
And RSLs have told us they plan to increase their borrowing by an additional £1.5 billion over the next five years.
During 23/24, 19 RSLs arranged new finance totalling £198m and that compares to £578m in the previous year. We have heard from landlords that this significant reduction is partly because of high interest rates which have deterred landlords going to the market and also the fall in plans to build new homes.
This all meant on March 24, RSLs had available cash and undrawn facilities of £1.48bn. And as we have highlighted in our recent report, while this is a reduction of £170m compared to the previous year, it does show that RSLs’ liquidity in aggregate terms remains strong.
So how has that debt changed?
All the new funding arranged in 23/24 was traditional bank lending, but we are aware that some private placements have been completed since March.
And who lends to RSLs?
Thirty-four different lenders and investors help fund the sector providing 1,149 loans, to which more than 2,097 lending covenants are attached.
It won’t be news to anyone here but it’s important to remember that as the Bank of England sought to reduce inflation through interest rate rises, the cost of debt increased substantially.
And so, we saw that RSL expenditure on interest costs increased to £253 million (2022/23 £202 million) in 23/24. This represented approximately 15.1% of landlords’ (13.0% in 2022/23) income from gross rent and service charges. This increase in proportion of interest charges reflects the incremental interest rate rises for existing debt during 2023/24 and the full year cost impact of significant new debt sourced in the previous year.
Of the total RSL loan debt outstanding at the 31 March 2024, 29% of the debt outstanding is on a variable interest rate and 71% on a fixed interest rate.
48% of new loans were agreed on fixed interest rate terms compared 52% on variable interest rate terms. And 31% of the new variable rate loans were revolving credit facilities.
As I have said already, this may reflect the economic uncertainty last year regarding interest rates and their future direction, potentially indicating a reluctancy to lock into the current higher fixed interest rates over the medium to longer term as RSLs anticipate possible future interest rate reductions. And sourcing variable rate debt, including revolving credit facilities, will allow greater flexibility for future refinancing.
We as a regulator have been clear that when RSLs are faced with periods of economic uncertainty, it is essential they maintain sufficient liquidity and also that they maintain the confidence of current and future lenders and investors.
And as the cost of debt has increased materially and financial markets continue to shift, it is also vital that Governing Bodies maintain the skills and expertise to understand and ensure that the financial products supporting their business are the appropriate ones for the RSL and that they are able to access independent financial advice.
We are currently analysing RSL accounts and projections and will publish the outcomes from this shortly. But I thought this was a good opportunity to say a little about our analysis to date.
So, turning to RSL annual accounts we see that:
At an aggregate level in 23/24:
-
turnover increased by 6% to £2.1 billion
-
those of you who have been around for some time will recall when the sector turnover hit £1 billion and now for the first time it has exceeded £2bn
-
operating costs increased 7% to £1.76 billion, outstripping the rise in turnover and above the previous year’s rise
-
planned and reactive maintenance costs rose by 10.7%, as RSLs continue to catch up on works
-
operating surplus after exceptional items rose by 3% to £378 million
-
cash generation from operating activities decreased marginally from £616.6 million in 2023/24 to £615.9 million
-
EBITDA MRI interest cover, reduced to 200% from 246% in 22/23; Although the cover has reduced substantially, it remains at a favourable level, particularly when compared with the aggregated value for Registered Providers in England
-
voids, arrears, and bad debts either remained around the previous year’s levels or showed some improvement, despite the challenges facing tenants and I think demonstrates the positive impact of the work done by RSLs to mitigate these
-
in aggregate, the average rent increase for RSLs in 20234/24 rose well below both CPI and RPI although its also worth saying here that we know the position for 2024/5 saw average rent increases were above CPI
So, as you can see in general, during 2023/24, RSLs in aggregate withstood the difficult economic and operating conditions. At the aggregate level, the sector’s financial performance and strong liquidity suggests that the sector is in a relatively strong position to respond to the financial challenges ahead. But we know those challenges are extremely significant and I will come on and say a little bit more about what these challenges have meant for some landlords.
Before I do that, I want to set out our findings from our early analysis of the financial projections we received from RSLs. This shows that at an aggregate level over the five years to 2028/29 RSLs forecast that they will:
-
continue to consistently generate operating and net surpluses;
-
annual turnover is forecast to increase by an average of 1.7% (2023, 1.0%) more than operating costs;
-
net assets are forecast to grow by an annual average of 3.7% (2023, 3.9%), taking aggregate net housing assets to £20 billion (2027/28, £18.77 billion), with net assets up to £5.7 billion (2027/28, £5.6 billion);
-
significant, but reducing cash reserves, with an aggregate closing balance of £561 million at March 24 dropping to £509 million by March 2029;
-
interest cover forecasts are lower than forecast in the 2023 returns, but remaining healthy;
-
rent arrears steadily reducing, from 3.4% in 2023/24 to 3.0% by 2028/29;
-
significant capital expenditure of £1.91 billion on existing homes, an average of more than £5,700 per property and this is a significant increase in what was forecast last year; and
-
a projected 22,600 new homes, to be funded primarily by £2.49 billion of social housing grant (53% of total cost) and £1.91 billion of private finance (40%)
So, taking all this together our overall conclusion is that based on RSL projections financial performance would continue to be robust over the next five years; however, there has been a clear tightening of RSL finances and there’s less margin for error which means good governance is ever more important.
But of course, we know the reality for some RSLs is that their financial positions continue to worsen.
As I’ve indicated our recent analysis has shown that, overall, the sector’s financial position is weaker than it has been for several years. And as I have said, this is at a time when RSLs are being presented with potentially significant bills for decarbonisation, tenant and resident safety and regenerating older homes. At the same time, we have also seen restraint in the rents RSLs have charged with increases having been below inflation for the last few years.
In order to deal with the financial headwinds caused by significant and sustained cost increases, many of which have been even higher for RSLs (for example construction materials) one of the options RSLs have taken is to cut the amount they plan to spend on building new social homes.
Whilst this reduction in new building has been necessary for some RSLs to remain financially secure, it unfortunately comes at a time when the country needs to build significantly more social housing.
Others are having to take additional action and differing actions to remain financially viable and this is why there’s been an increase in the level of financial engagement by us with landlords.
This slide shows the more common reasons for engagement in relation to financial challenges:
-
Potential cash deficits and borrowing for development not put in place in a timely manner.
-
Forecasting cash deficits due to level of investment required in stock.
-
Significant investment required in stock with no guarantee that external funding will be available to them.
-
Risk that impairment will cause a covenant breach.
-
issue with development due to contractor failure that is likely to lead to significant additional cost.
-
Restructure undertaken to drive efficiencies due to nature of business model.
-
Level of development and private finance required to fund it.
-
Review of community centre to be completed to ensure it remains viable.
-
Material cash outflows.
-
Low capacity to absorb further shocks to the organisation.
-
Issues with Heat with Rent (HWR) charges that have not increased to reflect the increase in energy prices
So, the reasons for engagement vary but essentially result from having to manage higher costs and lower income which in combination have put pressure on RSL finances.
I wanted to also cover two final areas:
Development
I mentioned that we have seen a reduction in the number of new homes that RSLs plan to build over the next five years. Based on the current projections, the rate at which we are building new social homes has fallen and is projected to remain at a lower level for the next five years.
RSLs forecast building or buying 22,577 homes over the five year period to March 2029; this is 13% down on the total forecast figure of 26,082 in the 2023 FYFPs, which itself was down by 17% on the previous year’s projections. Last year RSLs built or bought 5,022 new homes. This compares to a forecast of 6,109, meaning that they achieved just over 82% of their forecast new homes.
In the current context, it is an entirely understandable and reasonable business decision for a social landlord to halt or reduce its plans for growth. And, of course, social landlords have no statutory obligation to build new homes; but they do have duties to maintain existing homes to statutory standards. So, prioritisation of resources to invest in existing homes is likely to be reality for many social landlords in the coming years.
So, with a likely drop-off in the number of new homes being built and the potential for more existing homes to become obsolete – as it becomes more difficult for older homes to maintained or improved to expected standards – it’s not beyond the realms of possibility that we may enter a period when we start to see a risk of net loss in the overall supply of social housing.
We do however await the outcome of the Scottish Government’s budget due on 4 December to see what that says about the support for new housing.
Net zero
We still await the outcome from the Scottish Government’s consultation on new Net Zero Housing Standard for social landlords. Until we see the outcome of the consultation it remains difficult for landlords to understand what is expected of them and to factor this into their plans. This certainly adds to the challenge for social landlords’ budgeting and planning, in the short and longer terms.
For 2024, a total of 31 RSLs have indicated that they have considered de-carbonisation as part of their business planning process representing 22% of RSLs. This compares to 26 RSLs in the previous year which was 19% of the total. the majority of landlords told us that they are waiting for the policy framework to be put in place and more definite costings to be available before they will include anything.
As things stand, and given what we know about the proposed standard, and the current level of resources in social housing in Scotland, it is likely that the costs to social landlords to meet proposed standards on energy efficiency and clean heating will be unaffordable without either significant levels of government subsidy or rent increases that would seriously compromise affordability for most tenants, or significant reductions in other areas of expenditure.
Conclusions
As a regulator, we see the challenges that landlords are facing.
Our analysis of RSLs’ financial forecasts show that despite the tough and uncertain economic climate, RSLs in Scotland’s finances remain robust.
But increasingly we know that governing bodies are facing difficult decisions on trade offs as their finances tighten.
This also means RSLs will have reduced financial flexibility to respond to further challenges as they try to continue to show restraint on rent increases while also managing cost increases.
We have talked before about the ability of the sector to respond to the various challenges it has faced over many years.
While this certainly feels the most challenging context that I can recall in all of my time working in housing, we believe that the sector will be as well paced as it can be to respond to these challenges and continue to provide the much needed homes for their tenants.