The risks we will focus on - November 2024

Each year, we assess risk in social landlords to determine what assurance we need from them and what they may need to improve. Here we describe which risks we will focus on.

Published

28 November 2024

Background

Our annual risk assessment is one of the principal ways that we carry out our statutory functions to monitor, assess and report on all landlords’ performance of housing activities and the financial well-being and standards of governance of Registered Social Landlords (RSLs). It also determines the regulatory engagement we will have with all social landlords, and it determines the regulatory status for each RSL.

Each year, we consider the risks we should focus on in our risk assessment. Here we set out our approach for our 2024/25 risk assessment. 

Tenants, other service users and social landlords continue to face a difficult economic context with continued volatility and uncertainty.  The short- and longer-term path of economic growth, inflation and interest rates are all uncertain.   

In May 2024, the Scottish Government declared a national housing emergency. This sits alongside the declaration of housing emergencies in multiple council areas. Essentially there is a shortage of affordable, quality housing.  

Our risk assessment last year took place against a backdrop of: 

  • persistent cost of living challenges for households especially in food and drink prices, and energy costs; 

  • pressure on landlords to ensure affordability whilst balancing spending commitments, and at a time of persistent inflation in their costs and higher interest rates; 

  • systemic failures in the delivery of services to homeless households especially in the provision of suitable temporary accommodation; 

  • more acute risks in the building of new social homes due to cost inflation across all aspects of development, delays due to labour and material shortages and the negative impacts and costs of contractor difficulties; and 

  • homes being investigated for the presence of reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete (RAAC), and landlords taking steps to ensure the safety of tenants where it is identified. 

While we are seeing lower levels of inflation more recently, social landlords and their tenants are now facing permanently higher costs since the cost-of-living crisis especially for food and drink prices, and energy costs.  Therefore, pressure remains on lower income households in particular. 

We are also continuing to see systemic issues in the homelessness system. Homelessness numbers are continuing to rise and in some areas demands on local homelessness services exceed the capacity in the system to respond. For some councils, the increase in capacity that is needed goes beyond what they can deliver alone. This is what we mean when we describe some councils as being impacted by systemic failure.  And as things stand, there is a real risk of councils failing to meet their statutory duties and that becoming endemic in some council areas. 

At the same time there has also been a continued slowdown in the number of new homes being built.  We also know that social landlords are having to consider how best to manage the increasing and often competing demands on their resources to ensure that they continue to deliver warm, safe, dry homes for their tenants and which their tenants can afford. 

We take account of this context in our assessment of risk and say more about the current challenges and broader risk landscape in Appendix A. 

The main risks we will focus on

The broad areas we will consider are as follows: 

  • Homelessness – How councils deliver services for people who are threatened with, or experiencing, homelessness. This includes providing people who need it with suitable temporary accommodation.  

  • Development – How RSLs manage the impact on their finances of any plans for building new homes.  

  • Quality of homes – How councils and RSLs ensure that the homes they provide to tenants meet the Scottish Housing Quality Standard (SHQS), and whether they have a good understanding of the condition of those homes.  

  • Tenant and resident safety – How councils and RSLs meet their statutory obligations on tenant and resident safety.  

  • Financial health of RSLs – How financially healthy RSLs are and how well they manage their money with a focus on financial planning and compliance with Regulatory Standard 3.  

  • Good governance of RSLs – How well RSLs are run with a focus on compliance with Regulatory Standards.  

Our approach and priorities within these areas will be informed by the current challenges and risk landscape described in Appendix A.  For example, we will pay particular attention to councils’ compliance with the statutory obligation to provide temporary accommodation, increasing risk in the building of new homes, and compliance with tenant and resident safety obligations.   

Why and how we focus on these areas

Homelessness 

We have a clear focus on monitoring, assessing and reporting on social landlords’ performance on discharging their statutory duties to people who are experiencing or have experienced homelessness. 

The key areas we focus on are: 

Areas in our risk assessment  

What we consider  

Access   

Whether councils are complying with statutory duties to make inquiries into a person’s homelessness.  

Assessment  

How long it takes to complete homeless assessments and the decisions made. 

Temporary accommodation  

Whether councils are complying with statutory duties to offer temporary/emergency accommodation to people when they need it, the quality of the temporary accommodation, and how long people spend there waiting on a home.  

Outcomes  

How quickly people get settled accommodation after a council has assessed that it has a duty to provide this, the number of lets social landlords provide to people who are homeless, and sustainment of those lets.  

We will engage with all councils to aid our understanding of their performance in delivering effective and efficient homelessness services.  The focus for these ‘structured conversations’ will be temporary accommodation.  

The structured conversations will help us in our risk assessment by providing qualitative intelligence on how landlords are performing. These conversations will enrich the quantitative element of our assessment.  The quantitative element is based on Scottish Government official homelessness statistics which uses data it collects directly from councils.  The data element will consider our four key areas.  See Appendix B further below for details on the indicators we will use.   

We will consider again which councils we engage with because of systemic failure or being at heightened risk of systemic failure. We will make this determination based on whether, and the extent to which, councils are complying with their statutory obligation to provide suitable temporary accommodation.   

Performance (service quality) 

Landlords are required to meet the obligations placed upon them by the Scottish Government's Scottish Social Housing Charter. We will use 22 indicators that will allow us to assess progress against the Charter, and that take tenants priorities into account.  We will also consider the percentage of owners satisfied with factoring services.  See Appendix C for a list of these indicators. 

We know from our previous work that these indicators include the most important issues for tenants and service users, and those most relevant to our regulatory purpose in protecting the interests of tenants and other service users.  

We intend to supplement this data on service quality with the intelligence we have from notifiable events and our on-going engagement with landlords. We will also review all the Annual Assurance Statements (AASs) and consider any areas of non-compliance. 

Gypsy/Travellers 

We continue to engage with landlords that provide Gypsy/Traveller sites about their compliance with the minimum site standards set out by the Scottish Government, and about their obligations in relation to fire safety. The Scottish Fire and Rescue Service is the enforcing authority for fire safety at Gypsy/Traveller sites. Of the 28 sites provided by social landlords, two sites are currently closed whilst being rebuilt or awaiting a decision on being upgraded, and one site is temporarily closed for repair works. Of the remaining 25 sites, social landlords reported that 23 comply with Scottish Government’s minimum standards and with fire safety requirements; one complies with the minimum site standards but has yet to meet fire safety requirements, and one complies with fire safety requirements but has yet to meet the minimum site standards.  

Satisfaction amongst Gypsy/Travellers decreased to 66% in 2023/24 from 76% in 2022/23. This is the lowest level of satisfaction amongst Gypsy/Travellers since the introduction of the Charter and is lower than the satisfaction levels for other services provided by social landlords.  We will analyse the satisfaction data from the Annual Returns on the Charter (ARC) and consider what action, if any, we need to take with individual site providers.  

Financial risk assessment (FRA) 

For RSLs only, we have a statutory duty to monitor, assess and regularly report on RSLs’ financial well-being. The annual FRA is one of the main ways in which we carry out this statutory function.   

The FRA also allows us to make a judgement on whether RSLs comply with Regulatory Standard 3 (RS3) “The RSL manages its resources to ensure its financial well-being, while maintaining rents at a level that tenants can afford to pay”. Our regulatory response is based on the level of assurance we need or the improvements that landlords need to make. 

RSLs continue to face tough economic and operating conditions so strong liquidity is essential.  We use the following triage scoring tests to identify RSLs with poor liquidity:  

  • DSCR excluding opening cash balance; 

  • bad debts; 

  • arrears; 

  • voids; 

  • pension schemes with low active membership; 

  • proportion of development to opening units; 

  • variable debt percentage; 

  • covenant headroom; 

  • availability of private finance; and 

  • net cash inflow / (outflow) over 3 years. 

Having a triage process allows earlier identification of RSLs that may be perceived as being more risky or where early engagement is recommended.  However, in order to make a comprehensive judgement on whether an RSL complies with RS3 we also need to analyse RSL audited accounts, subsidiary accounts and annual audit management letters and responses and we do not receive this information until 30 September.   

As a result, a key element of the overall FRA process remains our assessment of the risk that an RSL will not comply with RS3 especially around financial well-being.  We do this using a series of ratio analysis and contextual information.  Each item is categorised under one of the following themes: 

  • General financial well-being – we will consider a range of financial ratios which are reliable predictors of financial stress to assess the level of risk;   

  • Rent Affordability – wo seek assurance that homes are provided at rents that tenants can afford;  

  • Pensions – we will seek assurance that RSLs understand the scale of the risk from the funding of pensions for employees and that decisions about how to address any historic deficit and future pension provision are taken on an informed basis; 

  • Other activities and group structures – we will seek assurance that any subsidiary/group/other activity is being appropriately managed and any risks to the RSL are identified and being effectively managed; 

  • Development – we will work with Scottish Government to ensure that we understand their plans to provide development finance to RSLs.  We check that the information provided by the Scottish Government is consistent with the financial projections' RSLs’ give us; and 

  • Treasury – robust treasury management underpins an RSL’s financial health, and our experience has shown that the consequences of poor treasury management can lead to financial viability issues. 

Stock quality and tenant and resident safety 

Our main source of intelligence for this strand of the risk assessment is the Scottish Housing Quality Standard (SHQS); the criteria for which cover a range of stock quality and tenant and resident safety standards.  And stock quality and tenant and resident safety are intrinsically interlinked.  

SHQS is the main way we measure the quality of social landlords’ housing stock.  

Compliance by landlords with SHQS first dropped in 2021/22, which we know was primarily because of the requirement for interlinked smoke and heat detectors (LD2s) to be installed in every home and for Electrical Installation Condition reports (EICRs) to be carried out every five years. Compliance with these was due by February and March 2022, respectively. 

As landlords have continued to work through a backlog of outstanding EICRs and fire safety installations, compliance with SHQS has gradually increased. By 31 March 2024, 84% of homes were compliant with SHQS. 

Last year, we reviewed the ARC and AASs to identify the scale of outstanding EICRs and LD2s for each landlord.  We sought further information from the landlord if required. We then engaged with landlords based on the volume of checks outstanding and if we had concerns about the landlord’s capacity or willingness to complete the checks as quickly as possible. We will take a similar approach this year to ensure we identify those landlords who have a significant backlog of outstanding checks. 

However, it is important that our assessment of SHQS is not solely focused on EICRs and LD2s, and that we consider other reasons why landlords’ homes do not meet SHQS. We will ensure we understand the reasons why a landlord’s properties do not meet SHQS and how landlords are dealing with it.  

Gas safety 

Each year once the ARC returns have been submitted, we review any missed gas safety checks which are reported by landlords (indicator 11 of the ARC).  The outcome of this year’s review was that all checks had subsequently been completed.  

We will review any trends in gas safety failures to consider any further assurance we may require about landlords’ compliance with these important duties. 

RAAC 

Last year, we asked all landlords to tell us if they had found RAAC in their homes or if they were still investigating the presence of RAAC. At the conclusion of the risk assessment in 2023, 13 landlords had identified RAAC; all told us they had appropriate management plans in place. We included reference to this in their engagement plans at that time. As at November 2024, 16 landlords have identified RAAC in their housing stock, and 4 landlords are still investigating whether RAAC is present in some of their homes.  We will continue to engage with those landlords to get assurance about the plans they have in place to assess RAAC and the timescales for completion of these investigations. We will also engage with any landlord that has any RAAC and will seek assurance that they have plans to manage this.   

Annual Assurance Statements 

In March 2024, we wrote to social landlords to ask them to again include a specific statement on their compliance with all tenant and resident safety duties in this year’s AAS. We said in the letter that this should include gas, electric, water, fire and lift safety, asbestos and damp and mould. We also asked landlords who have identified RAAC and do not have a plan to manage the risks associated with it to highlight this in their AAS. 

We will assess areas of non-compliance declared in the AAS which relate to outstanding EICRs and/or LD2s as part of the stock quality strand of the risk assessment. We will also consider other reported areas of tenant and resident safety non-compliance from the AAS.  

EESSH 

The Scottish Government’s Energy Efficiency Standard for Social Housing (EESSH) forms part of SHQS, and up until 2021/22, we also asked landlords to separately report their compliance with EESSH within their ARC return. The EESSH data collection was paused when the Scottish Government started its review of EESSH2, and so we do not have EESSH-specific data for 2023/24. We did not assess EESSH compliance for the last two years for this reason. 

Some landlords have told us that they are not progressing with work to improve their compliance with EESSH whilst the review of EESSH2 is ongoing, and while they await the outcome of the Scottish Government’s consultation on the Social Housing Net Zero Standard, so as to maximise value for money in terms of investment.  

Therefore, we will not consider landlords’ compliance with EESSH this year.  

Development 

RSLs need to ensure that they fully understand the additional risks inherent in the development process and the potential impacts on their strategic plans, should these risks materialise. This includes regularly reviewing and updating assumptions about capacity to develop and development costs to ensure plans are realistic and deliverable. Robust strategic and financial planning is vital.  Given the increased risk exposure that development activity continues to bring we will retain the indicators listed in Appendix D which we have considered in previous development risk assessments. 

Governance 

Good governance by RSLs underpins the delivery of good financial health and services.    

Social landlords assuring themselves, their tenants and us is central to our approach to regulation. All social landlords must therefore prepare and publish an AAS in accordance with our statutory guidance to confirm whether they are meeting regulatory requirements including Regulatory Standards, all relevant standards and outcomes in the Charter and all relevant legislative duties.   

In July 2024, we published a thematic review of social landlords’ approach to the AAS process which highlighted a range of positive practice in how landlords prepared their AAS and recommendations for landlords.   

In addition to the AAS our assessment of an RSL’s governance will also be informed by the following:  

  • ARC submissions received by May 2024;  

  • notifiable events;  

  • any reports by auditors under S72 of the Housing (Scotland) Act 2010;  

  • Annual Financial Statements (AFS);   

  • a review of governing body minutes from landlords’ websites; and  

  • regulatory intelligence from current engagement.   

We will also use the quantitative and qualitative information we gather from landlords in relation to:  

  • group structures (number of subsidiaries, complexity of arrangements and nature of subsidiary activity); and  

  • qualitative information including complaints about landlords, whistleblowing and serious concerns.   

As in previous years, we will also consider:   

  • staff turnover and absence rates;    

  • how frequently the RSL rotates the appointment of its external auditor; and   

  • the RSL’s internal audit arrangements. 

We also recognise that any RSLs engaging in significant organisational change, partnership or a transfer of engagements present particular challenges and risks to tenants and the organisations involved. If the organisational change involves a transfer of tenanted homes, RSLs must consult tenants in accordance with our published guidance. Our practice is to engage with RSLs taking forward an organisational change, especially when the change involves a transfer of tenanted homes, to seek assurance that tenants’ interests are protected. As such, we utilise the governance risk assessment to identify RSLs undertaking an organisational change to ensure this is captured during the risk assessment and we can respond to any risk through our regulatory engagement.  

We will evaluate all the information that we hold using a structured judgement approach to determine the level of risk to our objective and therefore the level of engagement we need to have about governance. This will also inform our regulatory judgement on the regulatory status that we will apply to each RSL. 

A full summary of the areas we consider in relation to governance are set out in Appendix E.  

Appendix A

Strategic context and landscape 

Continuing challenges in delivering homelessness services 

In our work, we are seeing acute issues in housing which reflect some of the reasons which have led to the declaration of the housing emergencies. We are seeing in particular the number of homelessness applications continuing to rise and, perhaps most significantly, a marked increase in failures by councils to meet their statutory duties in relation to homelessness.  Systemic failure requires a systemic intervention. The key headlines from the latest Scottish Government statistics shows that: 

  • there was a continued increase in new and open applications from the previous year (4% and 9% respectively), but also in the number of closed cases (8%); 

  • there were continued increases in the numbers in temporary accommodation as at 31 March 2024 from the year before (9%); 

  • the number of children in temporary accommodation increased by 5% compared to last year to 10,110 in 2024; 

  • households with children spend on average, the longest time in temporary accommodation; and 

  • average time from assessment to case closure has increased greatly over time from 226 days in 2019-20 to 278 days in 2023-24. 

Financial capacity 

Our analysis of the financial health of the sector shows that overall despite a tightening of sector finances and less margin for error, overall liquidity in the sector remains robust and RSLs in general have maintained sufficient liquidity. At the aggregate level, the sector’s financial performance and strong liquidity suggests that the sector is in a relatively strong position to respond to the financial challenges ahead. But we know those challenges are extremely significant.  We also know the reality for some individual RSLs is that their financial positions continue to worsen.   

Our recent analysis has also shown that, overall, the sector’s financial position is weaker than it has been for several years. This is at a time when RSLs are being presented with potentially significant bills for decarbonisation, tenant and resident safety and regenerating older homes. More recently social landlords have seen additional costs associated with recent changes to National Insurance contributions for their employees. At the same time, we have also seen restraint in the rents RSLs have charged with increases having been below inflation for the last few years.   

In order to deal with the financial headwinds caused by significant and sustained cost increases, many of which have been even higher for RSLs (for example construction materials) one of the options RSLs have taken is to cut the amount they plan to spend on building new social homes.   

Whilst this reduction in new building has been necessary for some RSLs to remain financially secure, it comes at a time when the country needs to build significantly more social housing.  Others are having to take additional action and differing actions to remain financially viable and this is why there was an increase last year in the level of financial engagement by us with landlords.  

Development of new homes 

For RSLs the development process carries a significant range of additional risks which, if not properly managed, have the potential to seriously impact on individual RSLs, their tenants and on the sector as a whole.  

RSLs now face greater risk flowing from permanently and significantly higher costs due to persistent cost inflation over the last two years across all aspects of development (both the build itself and financing the build).  Some also face continuing delays due to labour and material shortages, albeit these have eased slightly in the last 12 months.  However, in some areas of Scotland – especially those that are rural or remote rural – these shortages are persistent which in turn increases costs further through the price dynamics of demand exceeding supply. 

At the same time the Scottish Government level of grant available for each new build has remained unchanged, and the overall Scottish Government budget for new build grant has been reduced.  This may mean some developing landlords choose to “front-fund” some or all of their new build. This potentially introduces further risks and it will be important that landlords ensure that they only consider this where they have an agreed grant offer from Scottish Government in advance of starting this work.  Future rental income streams also remain uncertain as a result of increases in tenant rent arrears and pressure to keep rents as low as possible.   

Based on the current projections, the rate at which landlords are building new social homes has fallen and is projected to remain at a lower level for the next five years.  RSLs forecast building or buying 22,577 homes over the five-year period to March 2029; this is 13% down on the total forecast figure of 26,082 in the 2023 RSL Five Year Financial Projections, which itself was down by 17% on the previous year’s projections. Last year RSLs built or bought 5,022 new homes. This compares to a forecast of 6,109, meaning that they achieved just over 82% of their forecast new homes.   

In the current context, it is an entirely understandable and reasonable business decision for a social landlord to halt or reduce its plans for growth. And social landlords have no statutory obligation to build new homes; but they do have duties to maintain existing homes to statutory standards. So, prioritisation of resources to invest in existing homes is likely to be reality for many social landlords in the coming years.  

So, with a likely drop-off in the number of new homes being built and the potential for more existing homes to become obsolete – as it becomes more difficult for older homes to maintained or improved to expected standards – it’s not beyond the realms of possibility that we may enter a period when we start to see a risk of net loss in the overall supply of social housing.  

Net zero planning 

Until we see the outcome from the Scottish Government’s consultation on new Net Zero Housing Standard for social landlords it remains difficult for landlords to understand what is expected of them and to factor this into their plans. This certainly adds to the challenge for social landlords’ budgeting and planning, in the short and longer terms.  

For 2024, a total of 31 RSLs have indicated that they have considered de-carbonisation as part of their business planning process representing 22% of RSLs. This compares to 26 RSLs in the previous year which was 19% of the total. The majority of landlords told us that they are waiting for the policy framework to be put in place and more definite costings to be available before they will include anything.   

As things stand, and given what we know about the proposed standard, and the current level of resources in social housing in Scotland, it is likely that the costs to social landlords to meet proposed standards on energy efficiency and clean heating will be unaffordable without either significant levels of government subsidy or rent increases that would seriously compromise affordability for most tenants, or significant reductions in other areas of expenditure.  

Rent affordability 

Cost of living challenges persist for many tenants and other service users.  This is why in our risk assessment we continue to pay close attention to planned rent increases, affordability and levels of arrears. It is also why landlords must ensure that rents remain affordable.  In reviewing rent affordability landlords should consider Regulatory Standard 3 on rent affordability and financial sustainability when completing their AAS. And consideration should be given to what will be required to ensure future compliance with Standard 3. 

However, landlords themselves have permanently higher costs to access the materials, services and expertise that they need to carry out landlord functions and, more broadly, to meet their business plan commitments and other statutory obligations.  Reconciling these twin challenges remains a challenge for landlords.  

Tenant and resident safety 

The number and proportion of homes that meet SHQS in 2023/24 is still lower than in 2020/21.  The reduction in homes meeting SHQS since 2020/21 has largely been because of failures to meet the requirement to install interlinked smoke and heat detectors and to complete electrical safety inspections. 

This has meant there has been a backlog of outstanding inspections and installations which some landlords are continuing to address, and we are engaging with these landlords about this. By the end of 2023/24, there were more homes failing because of outstanding electrical safety inspections rather than smoke and heat detector installations. Landlords told us about difficulties gaining access to some tenants’ homes to meet these requirements. 

Although many landlords now have up to date EICRs in all of their tenants’ homes, some landlords have told us that some EICRs were carried out more than five years after the last one. It is essential that landlords have effective and robust policies, procedures and systems in place to ensure that they meet their tenant and resident safety duties – including electrical safety – on time.  This is particularly the case for many councils where there are high levels of non-compliance.   

It remains important that landlords are communicating directly with their tenants to reassure them that if RAAC is found, there is no immediate risk, or that the required action is taken where there is. All landlords with RAAC must have an action plan in place to manage it.   

It remains important that landlords take timely and effective action on damp and mould when found in tenants’ homes.  Landlords should have systems in place to ensure their tenants’ homes are not affected by damp and mould and that they have appropriate, proactive systems to identify and deal with any reported cases timeously and effectively.  

Following the Grenfell Tower Fire in 2017, legislation to ban combustible cladding on high-risk buildings, and the highest risk metal composite cladding material from all buildings, was passed by the Scottish Parliament on 22 April 2022.  It remains important that landlords have a full understanding of their stock including whether any homes or buildings have combustible cladding.  If and where identified the landlord should take immediate action to ensure the safety of tenants and residents. 

Lets and voids 

For the five years to the end of March 2020 the number of homes that became empty was consistently around 50,000 each year. In 2020/21, the year the pandemic first impacted, the number of homes becoming empty dropped by 17% to just under 42,000, before rising to just over 47,000 in 2021/22. However, the number of homes becoming empty dropped in each of the next two years.  

Lower turnover means that social landlords have significantly fewer homes available to let to people in need, including those who are experiencing homelessness, than they had ten years ago. 

Homes were, on average, empty for 57 days in 2023/24, marginally up on the previous year and significantly up on 32 days in 2019/20. The time taken by councils to re-let empty homes increased to 73 days in 2023/24 from 67 in 2022/23. RSLs reduced the time taken to re-let empty homes to 39 days in 2023/24; this is down from 44 days in 2022/23, but not yet back to the low of 26 days in 2019/20. Social landlords lost £40.9m in 2023/24 rent from homes being empty in 2023/24, marginally up on the year before. 

Social landlords have told us about a range of challenges they are experiencing that are negatively impacting on how quickly they can bring empty homes back in to use. These include availability of labour and materials, contractor difficulties and problems with getting utility companies to move quickly on installing or updating gas and electricity meters. Landlords have also told us about a growing problem of homes being left in a poor condition by departing tenants, and so requiring more work to bring them back to a lettable standard; many landlords attribute this emerging problem to increasing levels of vulnerability amongst tenants.   

We say more about this an analysis of the ARC data for 2023/24 that social landlords submitted on empty homes and lettings, as well as data submitted by RSLs on their plans to build new homes. 

Data accuracy 

Landlords must have complete and accurate information about the homes they provide to tenants including stock condition, their performance and their finances to comply with regulatory standards and the Scottish Social Housing Charter. Landlords should seek to assure themselves that their decisions are based on good quality data and that they are providing complete and accurate information to the Regulator.  This is particularly the case for issues relating to tenant and resident safety where some landlords have reported not having a full understanding of whether and the extent to which they comply or otherwise with their statutory obligations.  

Cyber security 

It is important that landlords consider what security they need to put in place to protect their digital systems, including the personal data of tenants, other service users and their staff. 

Gypsy/Traveller sites and homes 

Landlords who manage sites told us that the condition of their site is the main driver for satisfaction levels, and that higher dissatisfaction was mainly because work to upgrade sites was either ongoing, delayed or was required. Conversely, landlords who had recently upgraded sites reported high levels of satisfaction.  Furthermore, there remains longstanding and fundamental issues with the quality of accommodation.  For example, the minimum site standards are indeed only minimum at some sites even after upgrades.  Most sites also remain in locations that are neither close to local services nor have good transport links.  Landlords who manage sites must ensure that there is on-going compliance with site standards and fire safety requirements.  

We also know from our Tenant and Gypsy/Traveller Participation thematic that Gypsy/Travellers at some sites do not always feel that their views are sought and properly taken account of.  There also remains a fundamental issue of trust between some Gypsy/Travellers and their landlord for longstanding and complex reasons.   These issues are also likely to be drivers of lower satisfaction levels.  It is important that landlords understand the barriers to involving Gypsy/Travellers in participation and landlords should identify and implement a range of accessible options and solutions to address these barriers.   

Landlords who manage sites must ensure that they meet all 16 standards and outcomes in the Scottish Government’s Social Housing Charter with regards Gypsy/Travellers and their homes.    

 

Appendix B

Information and indicators we use to assess risk in relation to homelessness  

Homelessness – councils only (all data from Scottish Government) 

Homelessness applications by council  

Number of live homelessness cases as at 31 March 

Homelessness assessment decisions, as a proportion of all assessments, by council  

Summary homelessness assessment decisions of all assessments, by council  

Applications assessed as homeless or threatened with homelessness, by council  

Number of children associated with applications assessed as homeless or threatened with homelessness  

Households re-assessed as homeless within one year, by council  

Average time (days) from application to assessment, by council  

Households in temporary accommodation as at 31 March, by council  

Households with children or a pregnant woman in temporary accommodation as at 31 March, by council   

Number of children in temporary accommodation as at 31 March, by council   

Number of cases closed as a proportion of total cases closed, by number of temporary accommodation placements and council  

Average total time (days) spent in temporary accommodation for cases that closed, by council 

Average total time (days) spent in temporary accommodation for cases that closed, by household type and council   

Time households spent in temporary accommodation for cases that closed, by council  

Offers of temporary accommodation refused by the applicant, by council 

Instances where households requiring temporary accommodation have not been offered temporary accommodation, by council  

Number of temporary accommodation placements that have been in breach of the Unsuitable Accommodation Order, by council  

Outcomes for households assessed as unintentionally homeless or threatened with homelessness where contact was maintained, by council  

Average time (days) from assessment to closure for applications assessed as homeless or threatened with homelessness, by council  

Housing support assessments for households assessed as homeless or threatened with homelessness where contact was maintained, by council   

 

 

 

Appendix C

Service Quality Indicators – all landlords 

 

Indicator 

ARC Ref. 

percentage of tenants satisfied with the overall service  

I1 

percentage of tenants who feel their landlord is good at keeping them informed about services and decisions  

I2 

percentage of tenants satisfied with opportunities to participate in their landlord’s decision-making processes 

I5 

percentage of tenants satisfied with the quality of their home 

I7 

percentage of tenants satisfied with the landlord’s contribution to the management of the neighbourhood they live in 

I13 

percentage of tenants who feel the rent for their property represents good value for money 

I25 

percentage of tenancy offers refused during the year  

I14 

the percentage of all complaints responded to in full  

I3 

average time in working days for full response to complaints  

I4 

the percentage of lets to homeless people  

C2 

average length of time taken to complete emergency repairs  

I8 

average length of time taken to complete non-emergency repairs  

I9 

percentage of reactive repairs completed right first time 

I10 

percentage of tenants who have had repairs and maintenance carried out in the last 12 months satisfied with the service 

I12 

percentage of anti-social behaviour cases reported in the last year which were resolved  

I15 

percentage of rent lost through property being empty during the last year 

I18 

average time taken to re-let properties in the last year 

I30 

rent collected as a percentage of the total rent due in the reporting year 

I26 

gross rent arrears as at 31 March as a percentage of rent due for the reporting year 

I27 

the percentage of new tenancies sustained for homeless people 

I16 

the percentage of new tenancies sustained for others 

I16 

percentage of factored owners satisfied with factoring services 

29 

 

 

Appendix D

Development Risk Indicators – RSLs only 

 

  1. Forward Programme Scale: the size of the current programme over the next five years  

  1. Forward Programme Tenure: the provision of mid-market rent, low-cost home ownership, private rent and outright ownership properties   

  1. Forward Programme impact on the RSL: the impact of the forward programme on the size (units owned and managed) of the RSL 

  1. Increase in Programme scale: the change in scale of development plans between the past three years’ outturn and coming three years’ planned programme 

  1. RSL Capacity: the RSL’s recent experience of delivering a development programme over the past three years  

  1. Financial Planning: development cost and grant assumptions 

  1. Compliance with Regulatory Standards: details of any areas of non-compliance with the Standards which relate to the delivery of the development programme 

Overlaid with: 

  1. Level of recent assurance: where we have recently reviewed the RSL’s business plan and have sufficient assurance about its development plans.  

 

 

Appendix E

Governance Indicators – RSLs only  

 

 

 

Staffing  

  • Turnover for senior staff and all staff 

  • Sickness absence rates 

Governing Body (GB) details: 

  • Numbers on the GB 

  • Those RSLs with 7 or fewer GB members  

  • Length of service for all members.  This lets us look at those with >9 years’ service and where there are a lot of members with short service.  

  • Date the Chair was elected.  We can see Chair’s length of service and highlight those > than 5 years. 

  • Review of minutes of governing body minutes of meetings 

Equalities -ethnicity and disability information for  

  • GB members 

  • Staff 

Group Structure information (non-financial) 

  • Number of subsidiaries and description RSLs included in their ARC  

Workflows:  

  • Notifiable events. Numbers reported and where none have been reported. Nature of the events and whether they raise concerns about governance.  

Audit activity (AFS/Finance Team source) 

  • No internal audit 

  • Internal audit and provider (in house or external commission) 

  • External auditor in place for more than 10 years 

  • Any reports by auditors under S.72 of the Housing (Scotland) Act 2010 

Annual Assurance Statements 

  •  Date statement submitted 

  • Statement complies with our guidance 

  • SHR judge RSL to be non-compliant 

Other 

  • Whistleblowing  

  • Serious Concerns (previously known as Significant Performance Failures)  

  • Complaints 

  • Significant organisational change, partnerships and transfers 

RSLs with care activity (AFS) 

10 

Pensions – where defined benefit schemes only (source AFS)